|
From our colleagues at KU Leuven:
The use of metrics in assessing research(ers) has a long history and has often sparked controversy. Not infrequently, this was the result of a very strong faith in the power of numbers and the idea that quantitative data are objective and 'self-evident'. In addition, the wide availability and apparent simplicity of these data led to their great popularity. The calls for a more responsible use of metrics are to all extents justified. KU Leuven demurs from denouncing the value of metrics altogether or to merely replace existing metrics with new ones. Instead, the University considers the use of quantitative data in assessments to be relevant and justifiable, if both the providers and the users of these metrics know how to use them in a scientifically correct way. The Leiden Manifesto proved one of the most useful and relevant standards against which to set generally applicable practices and a simple checklist for use by evaluators and the evaluated. Both tools assist in assessing the degree to which metrics that are provided/used are in accordance with responsible behaviour. KU Leuven is now informing its staff and research evaluators to disseminate its nuanced policy on the use of metrics in research assessment. Four key values constitute the pillars upon which assessments at KU Leuven are to be based: collective excellence, personal growth & innovation, leadership and Open Science. To endorse researchers to write their own narrative, KU Leuven introduced the biosketch in processes of hiring and promotion for senior academic staff in 2018. Do metrics still have a place in this approach? KU Leuven believes the answer to this question to be a full hearted “yes”. KU Leuven is committed to creating a stimulating and appreciative environment for academics in which due attention is given to a diversity of profiles and personal trajectories. This commitment implies that assessments should appreciate and recognize of a wide range of activities and outcomes in the classical three academic spheres of research, education and engagement. Comments are closed.
|